twitterbird_mouthclosed
Twitter pollution, spammers?
Twitter pollution. Authors who send the same messages multiple times a day. Sometimes with a slightly different nuance, so that it is easier to measure which message someone responded to. Is this bad? “ You are spammers ,” said host Loïc Le Meur in his best English. Automated spammers, too, because there are programs that take care of this for you.
No, self-plagiarism
Self-plagiarism, I think. VU economist Peter Nijkamp made the front pages of major newspapers last week, he was accused of self-plagiarism. Apparently it is possible to steal from yourself. Nijkamp is a prolific writer, the most published economist in the world. In his prime he published one article every three days. And every now and then he takes over previously written paragraphs. In his case there are at least a few days in between and a completely different context. by Stapel's syndrome . Kawasaki and denmark mobile phone number list Vaynerchuk, they are the real polluters. They repeat themselves four times a day, automated. They are slow stutterers looking for attention and followers.
This column was also published in Het Financieele Dagblad. Photo intro courtesy of Fotolia.
Create your own training: 5, 6 or 7 days of learning
Are you interested in following multiple Frankwatching trainings? Then choose 5, 6 or 7 days of learning and put together your own training. You can choose from more than 50 trainings (both 1- and multi-day), determine the start date, order and pace yourself and also receive a 10% discount. Want to know more?
Others also read
Don’t come across as a fraud with AI? How to maintain authenticity in texts
Why We Return 1 in 5 Products (and How That Can Change)
RedNote: the alternative for 'TikTok refugees'?
Read 14 comments
About the autho.