The big websites now usually have a doctor who doesn't write themselves, but at least checks the facts, which is also called that and clearly marked. Being open about how information is treated seems to have helped. Authoritativeness: The point here is that you are perceived as an authority by others. Many believe that this is primarily about backlinks from large, reputable websites. About recommendations, mentions, background information about the author and the website. For Google, an authority is probably the one that is generally recognized.
Here again the question: are the biggest on the market really laos whatsapp always the most reputable or best in their field? Don't such companies always engage in reputation management? Trustworthiness: This is about the trustworthiness of a website. This starts with clear contact information and goes on to author experience and scientific backgrounds. A broad topic. The consensus, however, is that trust exists when sources, authors, owners, operators, terms and conditions and everything else are clearly recognizable and easy to find.
So don't hide this information, on the contrary, display it as clearly as possible. Which supposedly also has an influence on EAT There are a few other points that have proven important in some experiments and initial studies. These include the following: Affiliate links in an article seem to have a negative influence, especially when it comes to sensitive topics (health, money). Buttons or advertising breaks, CTAs and similar elements are just as harmful as affiliate links.