However, several obstacles limit this necessary awareness. On a conceptual level, the idea that human beings are external to ecosystems reduces nature 7 to a simple exploitation tool 8 . On a methodological level , the absence of an aggregated and unique indicator prevents a clear quantification of ecosystem services or human impacts. For companies, integrating these issues requires a mapping of dependencies and risks linked to biodiversity, a mapping that requires both local and global analysis .
Far from being a simple constraint, the south korea phone number list preservation of biodiversity also offers economic opportunities. Regulatory developments, such as the CSRD directive, encourage a strategic integration of biodiversity , a change in the business model and promote long-term competitiveness. In addition, the valorization of environmental services, nature-based solutions and biodiversity certificate markets 9 are all levers to be explored further. These initiatives must be accompanied by proactive economic and environmental diplomacy to ensure a global transformation of the value chain and limit distortions of competition .
Applying the concept of “planetary boundaries” to a territorial scale could be another promising way to combat biodiversity loss. This approach is based on the identification of nine key processes (climate change, biodiversity loss, disruption of nitrogen and phosphorus cycles, changes in land use, etc.) for which exceeding certain thresholds compromises the stability of the biosphere. Based on numerical indicators associated with habitability thresholds, they constitute a powerful analytical tool for objectivizing the pressures exerted on biodiversity and thus prioritizing the actions to be taken.