The traditional “big leap” approach

[rakhirhif8963]

To complicate matters further, most organizations must support the coexistence of on-premises and cloud identity systems until legacy systems are decommissioned. On-premises systems contain identity data, such as complex group memberships or sensitive HR information, that is needed to control access to cloud applications and services. This sensitive data is typically not migrated, and may never be migrated, to cloud identity systems. This creates an additional layer of complexity.

to migration is disruptive to both end users and application owners. Mass migrations with tight deadlines typically require password resets or drastic changes to the user login experience.

Another common obstacle is ensuring data consistency germany mobile database quality. For example, most organizations use multiple identity sources, such as Active Directory (AD), LDAP, SQL databases, and applications that contain identity data. All of these data sources need to be rationalized and integrated. If identity data and related attributes are not displayed correctly, the organization may face inadequate access to applications and services.

Unsurprisingly, taking a “big leap” approach raises the stakes and the stress level. For example, if too many issues arise during the transition, enterprises often abandon the legacy identity management system entirely.

Worse, some organizations try to avoid these problems by simply postponing their move to the cloud. This often undermines digital transformation projects aimed at improving efficiency and competitiveness.

Orchestrating the transition to the cloud
Solving these challenges requires different thinking and different tools. One best practice is to use an orchestration layer to orchestrate the transition between legacy and cloud identity systems. This replaces a large-scale migration with an agile, gradual migration of identities and applications to the cloud identity system.