But Not in the Way We Think

[sadiksojib35]

Both sides are interested in making good education more accessible. Then, even in the most remote places, talented students will be able to study at prestigious universities and colleges without leaving their hometown.

Algorithms, in turn, will be able to identify talents malta telegram database at early stages, bypassing city and international Olympiads and selecting optimal programs and educational tracks. This will help make education more inclusive and unbiased: when children of different nationalities, social classes and physical abilities will have absolutely equal chances on par with everyone else.




AI has exploded into education on the back of the ChatGPT hype. But using large language models and generating images is not a radical change. AI is just another tool for work and study that both students and teachers will have to master.

At first, teachers were wary of AI technology, but as they began to understand its strengths and weaknesses, they found practical applications. After all, students and schoolchildren had been cheating before, but now ChatGPT was doing it for them.

Instead of prohibiting, we need to teach children to "steal like artists": use generated texts openly, but refine them, delving into the task. This will help overcome the problem of the "blank slate" - when you fall into a stupor and do not know where to go next in your research.

The faster we all learn to use the new tool for good, the greater the chances of moving to a new level - when we ourselves can learn something from AI and give it all routine operations without constant supervision.

Perhaps, for this purpose, it is worth introducing the study of working with data and AI models as basic subjects. But for this, the problem of IT infrastructure in schools and universities must first be solved.