We answer questions about the anti-money laundering law and advise you on what to do if you encounter restrictions in the course “The most important things about 115-FZ” .
Charge VI: Common Law Unfair Competition by Appropriation - This charge alleges that the defendants engaged in unfair competition by appropriating The New York Times content. The dominican republic telegram database New York Times argues that it invests significant resources in creating its content, and that the defendants' use of that content without permission amounts to free riding on The New York Times' efforts and investments.
Charge VII: Trademark “Dilution” (15 U.S.C. § 1125(c)) - unauthorized use of its trademarks in connection with low-quality and inaccurate AI-generated content “dilutes” the quality of The New York Times’ trademarks. The charge alleges that such actions tarnish The New York Times’ reputation for accuracy, originality, and quality, causing economic loss.
To support these allegations, NYT lawyers wrote 44 pages of text compiled from Wikipedia articles and carefully selected “evidence”: texts and screenshots from ChatGPT.
I've looked at every screenshot and text in the NYT lawsuit, and I want to say that 99% of it is either irrelevant or is the work of past versions of GPT. The authors of the lawsuit made a "great discovery" - LLMs can hallucinate - but they couldn't get GPT-4 to generate the hallucinations they wanted, and used screenshots from two years ago. They asked the 2022 version of GPT-3 to generate text in the style of the New York Times, got the result, and presented it as evidence of OpenAI's malicious behavior.
Both the logic and the language of the NYT's lawsuit are extremely vague, no different from their coverage of current world events. Ridiculous "discoveries" and unintelligent reasoning serve as justification for a set of improbable demands:
Demand I. That The New York Times be awarded damages for all damages suffered or alleged in all conceivable forms, formats, and styles permitted by law or equity.
Claim II. To forever enjoin defendants from engaging in the unlawful, unfair, and infringing conduct alleged in the complaint.
Requirement III: Destroy all GPT or other LLM models and training datasets that include New York Times material.
The New York Times alleges that defendants
-
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2025 4:41 am