We needed to wake them up! But how? Wakie Wakie! We had several options and we used them all together

[zihadhasan012]

We linked to those "dead" links from other authority sites. We asked the webmasters to link the lost page from one of their top categories page (from sidebars for example). We asked the webmasters to create sitemaps for their websites. (How dare we?!) Some other methods. Results I was really surprised. We got something like 220 replies.


Some of them contained the word "OK" and that's it. Some jordan mobile phone numbers database asked questions about our interests, and some wanted to revive some old business connections.The final result after 2 weeks was ~200 fresh, clean, authority Google-indexed backlinks. Free of charge. Now we can go on and try harvesting some new backlinks. If you believe the rumors, we all now live in something called the real-time web. The once steady trickle of user-generated content became a torrent, and search engines face the difficult task of drinking from a fire hose without drowning.


It only stands to reason, then, that fresh content is becoming more important, and anecdotal evidence seems to back that up. Every day, blog posts and Tweets seem to get indexed and ranked a bit faster. Freshness seems important, but what signals does Google use to determine freshness? Beyond the original cache date, do the spiders pay attention to on-page signals, such as dates in body content or URLs? I thought it might be fun to try and find out.