For key processes this will not be a problem
Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2025 3:33 am
But on the other hand, we see external changes, new technologies that require greater openness. For example, artificial intelligence, which requires a large amount of data for analysis and building more complex integrated models. Or cloud infrastructure, which is becoming more and more secure, allows you to ensure the continuity of business processes more effectively than your own infrastructure. But at the same time, we should not forget about competition: even if we are talking about critical infrastructure, it is important to take into account the cost of maintenance.
In my opinion, applying the law to the entire critical infrastructure would be a mistake both in terms of timing and innovation.
since any delay, any stoppage of activity can affect bolivia whatsapp data life, and changes in the geopolitical situation (sanctions, etc.) in this case will no longer be able to suspend work.
But within this critical infrastructure, there are many processes that are not critical. They account for about 80% of all operating costs of companies. Stopping one of them even for a few hours does not affect the overall processes. In my opinion, these non-critical processes should be more open. The main thing is to ensure cost savings, new business opportunities, ensuring sustainability in the long term.
And here it is important to take into account three points:
Russian software requires that a company be able to register, but not all startups have this opportunity. Forcing this can block a large part of innovation;
the size of the Russian market for non-critical infrastructure (tracking people, assets, equipment) may be insufficient to provide cheaper services that allow collecting small information about all assets and finding information;
Foreign innovation can also help bring more value and develop new ideas - the key is the cost of the solution compared to the value created.
To ensure openness of critical infrastructure, the solution provider must:
In my opinion, applying the law to the entire critical infrastructure would be a mistake both in terms of timing and innovation.
since any delay, any stoppage of activity can affect bolivia whatsapp data life, and changes in the geopolitical situation (sanctions, etc.) in this case will no longer be able to suspend work.
But within this critical infrastructure, there are many processes that are not critical. They account for about 80% of all operating costs of companies. Stopping one of them even for a few hours does not affect the overall processes. In my opinion, these non-critical processes should be more open. The main thing is to ensure cost savings, new business opportunities, ensuring sustainability in the long term.
And here it is important to take into account three points:
Russian software requires that a company be able to register, but not all startups have this opportunity. Forcing this can block a large part of innovation;
the size of the Russian market for non-critical infrastructure (tracking people, assets, equipment) may be insufficient to provide cheaper services that allow collecting small information about all assets and finding information;
Foreign innovation can also help bring more value and develop new ideas - the key is the cost of the solution compared to the value created.
To ensure openness of critical infrastructure, the solution provider must: